[Accrs-ho] March Good Guys

ACCRS HO Scale accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org
Sun Mar 8 13:11:49 PDT 2015


None of those DCC locos were purchased by the club.   I donated them.

Dean


On 3/8/2015 1:01 PM, ACCRS HO Scale wrote:
> Message From: Paul Newhouse  pimininca at gmail.com
>
>    
>
>
> I recall the vote being taken.  Whether or not all DCC is fair, or 
> not, is clear to me, it's not.  Never mind I voted yes.  We should 
> probably, at least, consider a few more DCC engines and perhaps 
> trains.  I'm thinking passenger trains, right now I believe the only 
> really functional passenger train is the Amtrak.   Also a few more DCC 
> freight engines.  While I understand what drove the "locking up" of 
> the current DCC engines (are we still doing that?) it seems counter 
> productive (let's by stuff which we feel is too valuable to run??)
>
> Just a thought or two on the subject.
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:56 AM, ACCRS HO Scale 
> <accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org <mailto:accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org>> wrote:
>
>     Message From: Dean & Margaret Lewis lewis2 at earthlink.net
>     <mailto:lewis2 at earthlink.net>
>
>
>     Group,
>
>     I cut out early on the February meeting and didn't get in on the
>     discussion.   I have been in the hobby for a long time and also
>     gathered a sizable stable of analog locomotives.   Some I have put
>     in lots of hours on them running on the layout and others that are
>     just collecting dust as they have* never been run.*
>
>     I feel that the future will be with DCC (I voted against it way
>     back when) and have been actively converting those locos, that I
>     feel I am most apt to want to run, to DCC.   I have some in my
>     locker that are still analog for use when DCC is not the choice
>     for the day I am running on the layout.
>
>     Other than the expense of the decoder (which can be a problem to
>     those with limited funds) the installation isn't too difficult. 
>     Some are just direct "plug and play".  Others are not much more
>     complicated than putting together one of the more modern kits.  
>     Why don't we do a clinic on installing decoders.   Also, maybe if
>     we got together, as a club, we might be able to purchase a bunch
>     at a discount.
>
>     Operation is certainly easier and better with DCC and I know that
>     some that like to run analog have difficulties with the switches
>     and buttons on the control panel and depend on those that know how
>     to run it.   With DCC, most of these problems disappear.
>
>     Dean
>
>
>
>
>     On 3/8/2015 10:36 AM, ACCRS HO Scale wrote:
>>     Message From: Marc Stearmandmstearman at gmail.com  <mailto:dmstearman at gmail.com>
>>
>>        
>>
>>
>>     I actually raised the question at the Feb meeting about whether
>>     or not to run all DCC. There was a little bit of discussion and
>>     we did make the decision to run both days as DCC. I also have a
>>     lot of analog, but also agree that the shows tend to run smoother
>>     with more trains on DCC. I believe we could loan some of the club
>>     DCC engines to people who only have analog for the shows.
>>
>>     Ed, please correct me if I'm wrong.
>>
>>     Marc Stearman
>>
>>
>>     On Mar 7, 2015, at 4:43 PM, ACCRS HO Scale
>>     <accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org <mailto:accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org>> wrote:
>>
>>>     Message From: Gary Barbano gary_barbano at yahoo.com
>>>     <mailto:gary_barbano at yahoo.com>
>>>
>>>     Hello Members,
>>>     I join Lee with his argument over how operations are being decided
>>>     Our club has vast numbers of members who still op to run trains
>>>     on Analog and I am one of them
>>>     I choose to participate in these matters to voice my position
>>>     just as Lee and Andy
>>>     This is on my mind to get my interest in with our club
>>>     Thank You
>>>     Gary B
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Saturday, March 7, 2015 4:34 PM, ACCRS HO Scale
>>>     <accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org <mailto:accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>     Ed:
>>>
>>>     Not all of us decided to do DCC for the good guys show, and I
>>>     don't remember any vote taken on it.
>>>
>>>     I know I got shouted down by a certain member, when I asked to
>>>     do DC on Sunday.
>>>
>>>     Hence, I won't be participating in the Good Guys show, or any
>>>     other shows, with the exception of the Fair, and the Train Show,
>>>     if there is one on site.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Lee
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     -----Original Message-----
>>>     From: ACCRS HO Scale <accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org
>>>     <mailto:accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org>>
>>>     To: accrs-ho <accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org
>>>     <mailto:accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org>>
>>>     Sent: Fri, Mar 6, 2015 5:58 pm
>>>     Subject: [Accrs-ho] March Good Guys
>>>
>>>     Message From: Ed Carrenomyputertech at gmail.com  <mailto:myputertech at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>     All,
>>>     At last month’s meeting we decided to do DCC for both days. If
>>>     anyone has any questions about that and/or is willing or prefers
>>>     to do DC for one of the days, please let me know. The schedule
>>>     will be posted at the club and on the web.
>>>     Thank you
>>>     Ed Carreno
>>>     HO Train Master
>>>     ACCRS
>>>     myputertech at gmail.com <mailto:myputertech at gmail.com>
>>>     925-519-4796 <tel:925-519-4796> cell
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Accrs-ho mailing
>>>     list
>>>     Accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org  <mailto:Accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org>
>>>     https://mail.accrs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/accrs-ho
>>>
>>>     Message From: Lee And Joan Buckner buckyrailfan at aol.com
>>>     <mailto:buckyrailfan at aol.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Accrs-ho mailing list
>>>     Accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org <mailto:Accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org>
>>>     https://mail.accrs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/accrs-ho
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Accrs-ho mailing list
>>>     Accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org <mailto:Accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org>
>>>     https://mail.accrs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/accrs-ho
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Accrs-ho mailing list
>>     Accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org  <mailto:Accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org>
>>     https://mail.accrs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/accrs-ho
>>        
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Accrs-ho mailing list
>     Accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org <mailto:Accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org>
>     https://mail.accrs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/accrs-ho
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accrs-ho mailing list
> Accrs-ho at mail.accrs.org
> https://mail.accrs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/accrs-ho
>    

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.accrs.org/archives/accrs-ho/attachments/20150308/1832a79f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Accrs-ho mailing list